Happy Anniversary, War-tards

“I had the application the next day.”


-  U.S. Army Capt. Kelly Green describing the panicked time after 9/11 when she signed her life over to the Armed Forces 

The Chicago Sun-Times published an article today about the troops on the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan.  The Sun-Times, like most corporate newspapers, are captains of the obvious, terribly predictable.  Lately, for instance, they have been running a shocking expose about basketball star Derrick Rose's neighborhood Englewood.  The Sun-Times' Rick Telander explains about Englewood's violence, "This isn’t a foreign country or a hurricane or a concentration camp. This is us. Somehow we got here on our own."  It is that kind of riveting journalism that earned the Sun Times a Pulitzer Prize last year from the corporate newspaper honchos.  Nevermind alerting its readership about the dangers of an economy based on debt, war, and drug prohibition; rather focusing on the symptoms-  that wins awards in the corporate media sphere. 

The Sun-Times is again out-doing itself with its anniversary of the Afghanistan invasion.  Here is a look at some of the quotes by military personnel with The National Pulse's answers to each idiotic assumption.



NFL star Pat Tillman



“I honestly thought it was a situation where we would eventually find bin Laden and the sources of evil and it would be a swift action.  But looking back, we went about it the right way, to make sure 9/11 would never occur again. The soldiers who lost their lives in this war would not want us to pull out before the job is done."

-  Sgt. Leonard Haith, military recruiter, on his perspective of the war and why it is going on indefinitely


In this misdirected piece of information, Haith lets the audience know he is operating under a set of facts that has been thoroughly debunked.  Apparently, according to Haith, the19 Saudi hijackers were able to not only fly planes into World Trade Towers 1 and 2, but also deftly drop Building 7 perfectly in its own footprint.  If you are supposed to go into high schools and sell the military to youth, all of whom are disadvantaged by economic terrorists, it is better to not even graze the mountain of information that confirms that the 9/11 attacks were a purposeful attack by groups hoping to consolidate a New World Order with Israel and the Anglo-led countries in the economic lead.      


“I’m from a military family. I’ve known forever I wanted to be a soldier.  My generation, the 9/11 generation, didn’t know what it was like to go through years of war. But we have a ‘We won’t quit’ attitude.  Those who say ‘unwinnable’ haven’t been there to see what we’re fighting for. There’s pride, seeing both countries now taking over for themselves."


-  Sgt. Scott Carter, U.S. Army

According to Carter, people have to go there to understand.  This makes sense, because if you go there as an American, you will have to accept protection from the military or be killed by the pissed-off people who have lived through hell for ten years.  At home in America, the facts get in the way too easily.  Allied soldiers performed all kinds of atrocities due to foggy rules of engagement.  With this attitude by Carter, senior officials are safe and sound from any sort of punishment for misleading the world as to Iraq's missing weapons of mass destruction and shoddy sources like "Curveball." 

Tarouk Kolache before

How is it even possible to "win"?  Once the soldiers leave, they'll live as they always have-  according to their own customs, laws, and desires.     

“It’s probably true that none of us thought it was going to last this long, but now I see that it’s going to be very difficult to get out of it."

- U.S. Army Capt. Kelly Green, on the never-ending war in Afghanistan

Tarouk Kolache after

No, it isn't difficult.  It happens like all other losing wars of aggression have ended.  The losers put their tail between their legs and go home.  That is all there is to it.  Will the Afghans cry because no one is invading their homes at night any longer?  Probably not.

  

Don't Protest

   

"It expresses the frustrations that the American people feel that we had the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, huge collateral damage all throughout the country, all across Main Street, and yet you're still seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us into this problem in the first place."

-  Barack Hussein Obama discussing the Wall Street Protests

Why would anyone protest now? 
    
Better yet, why would anyone get a permit to protest?
     
The protests of Wall Street in New York and other cities are at least three years late and co-opted by corporate interests with the intention of providing a smoke screen for a larger false flag attack. To avoid getting charged with "parading without a permit," dissenters are forced to bow dutifully before shouting, carrying a sign, or clogging up main thoroughfares.  Because at this late stage of full-blown tyranny, where the head of state can legally assassinate citizens for suspicion, the situation well past the point of arousing the anger of others or telling the powers that be how the people feel about their theft of the world's prosperity. 




Michael Moore's "cabin" on the banks of Torch Lake, MI



The bankers that organized the fraud, the politicians that legalized their fraud, and the corporate press that refused to cover the facts of the blatant theft, know the inevitable is occurring.  Now the moneyed powers are attempting, just as they did during the Arab Spring, to lead and co-opt the protests, thereby confusing the real anger and ignoring the correct path to finally break away from the diabolical psychopaths in control of the world.  So millionaire Michael Moore wants to "end capitalism" and incited the mob yesterday saying, "We want the money back."   What a thing to say to the likes of Bernanke, Dimon, and Geithner who admit they print the money out of thin air.  Moore must have crafted those heart-felt words at his "cabin" on Torch Lake.  Roseanne Barr wants "the rich" (those who make over $100 million) to be re-educated, their wealth confiscated, or face death.  This is unique for Barr who must be too ignorant to understand that her 46-acre spread in Hawaii was deftly stolen by the same "banksters" she now opposes a little more than a century ago.       

Is the re-distribution of wealth by force the answer?  No, it isn't.  That is the bankster game.  They  force, they collude, monopolize, and brutalize.  They prop up third world dictators who oppress the natives while multi-national corporations steal a land's resources.  The bankster's game is up and they need people to jump into their trap; their constructed outlet for anger.  

"A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble."
 
-Mohandas Gandhi       
People should just wait and let the inevitable occur.  Why "occupy Wall Street and risk getting your head busted?  Let them have it.  When the crash finally happens, when no one is left to blame, everyone will get to see who stole their "money."  They'll realize that this collapse wasn't about money (because there is none, saving gold and silver) at all-  It was about control-  Control of land, control of people, control of law, control of third world nations, etc. To some extent, everyone has been a part of it.  The hard part for even the most fervent protester will be realizing the depth of their ignorance; that the elite have created the imaginary world based on the Federal Reserve note and that era, the paper money era, is over.   

                  

Drones and You

"All the war propaganda, all the screaming lies and hatred, comes invariably from the people who are not fighting."

-  George Orwell  (Author, 1903-1950)

Recently, Obama ordered the assassination of an American citizen for suspicion of plotting terrorism.  No proof was offered by the Administration; instead their word, they said, is to be trusted.  

The impersonal drone attack has become the signature war tactic of the Obama Administration in the war on terror.  If you are wondering how the U.S. government could just execute one of their own citizens without investigation or trial, you must be crazy.  Here-  listen to White House Spokesperson explain the case against Al-Awlaki and realize how silly your concerns are (the reporter asking the questions is ABC News' Jake Tapper):       



For those who still blow off fireworks on the Fourth of July, worshipping the military state and pretending they are free, should be shocked to know the U.S. Military trains more drone operators than fighter pilots.  Gone are the days when the likes of Maverick, Goose, Iceman, and Cougar seared across the sky trying to be "Top Gun" of the Navy.  Now, kids who grow up in front of a computer screen eating Cheetos for the first eighteen years of their life dream of being "Top Drone."   




Iceman (Val Kilmer) gets in the face of Maverick (Tom Cruise) in the competition to be "Top Gun"





And it is exactly this kind of cold, impersonal type of warfare NATO and their fellow aggressors wish to expand upon.  That is why the U.S. has opened up a chain of drone bases near Africa and along the Arabian Peninsula.  This type of war continues to evolve.  Its evolution is characterized by its lack of any accountability.  Just last week federal judge Rosemary Collyer ruled the CIA need not release any records relating to its use of unmanned drone aircraft.

Now that the U.S. has assassinated one of their own, what are the chances drones would be used in the United States?  If you guessed "not likely," you couldn't be more wrong.

Police across the country have been experimenting with the use of unmanned drones.  Even as the economy crashes, people lose their homes, and fall below the poverty line, the technology of drones is constantly being researched and improved.  The Nano/Hummingbird drone can spy on terrorists and they will only think it is a hungry hummingbird.  The ShadowHawk drone can taze humans from the air and is equipped with a 40mm grenade launcher and a multiple-shot 12-gauge shotgun.  Drone scientists, fattened from lucrative defense contracts, are using nature as their muse to make drones more insect-like.  Combined with biometric technology, terrorists, or, uh, anybody won't be able to hide without changing their face. 

   

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state." 

-  Ben Wizner, ACLU Lawyer, quoted on Sept. 30, 2011   

Obama has further trampled the Constitution by accepting a title higher than President of the United States, illegally bombing another sovereign country, appointing a "Super" Congress to work in secret, and now assassinating a citizen of the United States without due process.  There are no laws other than those that protect those that are ushering in a New World Order police state.  

A Lot Better Off

Ask yourselves – where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways and our bridges; our dams and our airports? What would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money on public high schools, or research universities, or community colleges? Millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the GI Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?



-Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama, "Jobs" Speech, Joint Session of Congress, September 8, 2011


Do you mean where would we be if we hadn't crisscrossed the entire country with concrete and asphalt, laying to waste acres upon acres of tillable land and deeding ownership of that land to corporations and governments? Are you asking if the people would have survived without the Federal Reserve inflation policies, booms and busts?

19th century photo from Harper's Weekly

Probably, this land would be a whole lot better off.

It has been said that in the early days of the American West, when the railroads intr
oduced European settlers to the land, adventurous train passengers would shoot the plentiful buffalo from their train seat. Many Europeans felt this a necessary undertaking in order to "civilize" the West. It was no secret that buffalo was the main staple of the Indian peoples and the decimation of the buffalo would end the lives of the nomadic Indians as they were accustomed.

The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 was an act of Congress that gave the railroad land grants- 400 ft. right-of-ways and ten square miles of land for every miles of track built.  This was, of course, not the first time government forces laid claim to land using only their ideology as precedent.  It has been going on for centuries.  Covered up by flowery language and force, government has amassed huge amounts of land.   

"If we ever owned the land we own it still, for we never sold it. In the treaty councils the commissioners have claimed that our country had been sold to the government. Suppose a white man should come to me and say, Joseph, I like your horses, and I want to buy them. Then he goes to my neighbor and says to him; Joseph's horses. I want to buy them, but he refuses to sell. My neighbor answers, Pay me the money and I will sell you Joseph's horses. The white man returns to me, and says, Joseph, I have bought your horses and you must let me have them. If we sold our lands to the government, this is the way they were bought."

-Chief Joseph-Nez Perce Nez Perce Indian Chief on the questionable custom of land ownership

Most people think that someone or something must own the land or else the world would disintingrate due to confusion....or something.  This very subject looks to be the special suprise lurking behind the economic crash.  Fading with the S&P and Dow Jones Industrial Average will be the authority needed to hold on to all the land government has reserved for itself.  As the banks try to get the states to accept a one-time payment for the trillions of mortgage-backed securities that were traded in the Wall Street Casino, the talks are failing.  Not only do the states not want to accept a one-time payment of an inflated curreny, taking the money wiould prevent the states from suing the banks again for foreclosures.   

 

What will stop the people from declaring allodial ownership?  The divine right of kings is dead and governments have proven time and time again they are corrupt.  What sort of bullshit justification will the supranational entities try to pull off to steal the land this time?